Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he had not offered her ample notice before raising her rent, citing a new state law that needs a minimum of 90 times’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new regulation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances of your case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable into the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified through the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Inside the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court from the United States. Decrease courts on the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related into the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that contain parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Just about every state has its own judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is often referred to given that the “supreme” court, While there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Despite the fact that state courts can also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons acquiring their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are for being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service will be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform away with the candidature with the petitioner. Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is perfectly-settled that while thinking about the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the advantage of many of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part from the respondent department.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish absent with the candidature on the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated over. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party and also the case shall be decided with the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
Summaries of cases that form the lives of younger individuals, ensuring a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and lovers alike.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review website does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.